From d6883433f809f5c2296afd5985e590e2be318172 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: rudybancks3403 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:36:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role --- ...And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md | 64 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md diff --git a/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md b/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..efbfbf9 --- /dev/null +++ b/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +
The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful gambling.
+
No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous celebrities were notably consisted of in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable sites providing both complimentary casino-style video games and financially rewarding rewards, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'bet complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.
[bit.ly](https://bit.ly/Bet9jaPromotionCodeYOHAIG) +
The sites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to mention [claim complainants](https://higgledy-piggledy.xyz/index.php/User:XHDKorey52) and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as standard casinos, only without the oversight, consumer securities and [tax laws](https://edenhazardclub.com/read-blog/10327_best-u-s-sports-betting-sites-amp-sportsbooks-for-2024.html). So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gambling levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.
+
One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the business faces accusations of illegal gaming in a New york city suit that declares VGW uses celeb endorsers to 'create a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)
+
'I'm uncertain" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.
+
Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of stars from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any differences in between standard [sports betting](https://mxlinkin.mimeld.com/read-blog/652_how-to-withdraw-from-bet9ja-8-step-guide-to-cash-in-your-wins.html) and sweepstakes play.
+
Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes casinos found online
+
Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous - but not all - video games are complimentary
+
Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he frequently promotes on social media
+
Read More
+
Donald Trump 'set to name NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'
+
Instead, advertisements usually focus around the social aspect of the [gambling](https://sosmed.almarifah.id/read-blog/115_missouri-sports-betting-ballot-measure-approved-by-voters.html) establishments, while omitting the capacity for real gambling losses.
+
Others tempt customers with pledges of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad showing off Drake's cars, planes and estates before pivoting to video footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.
+
'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' read the very first caption on the screen.
+
Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever quit.'
+
The disparity between [sports betting](http://wiki-tb-service.com/index.php?title=Benutzer:GlennaHumphries) sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.
+
A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competition with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, most of the players on [social-sweepstakes gambling](http://elevarsi.it/wiki/index.php?title=Utente:DamionRex17427) establishments are [sports betting](https://wooshbit.com/read-blog/18728_for-sports-gambling-to-be-legalised.html) complimentary.
+
'Most social sweeps customers never make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the common deposit or wager size at real-money online gambling websites.'
+
Social casinos use clients a chance to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the choice to buy worthless currency often described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for [genuine](https://ai.tienda/read-blog/7245_how-to-play-bet9ja-online.html) money, however can be used to open different functions within the games.
+
But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling clients to obtain other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be [exchanged](https://linkin.commoners.in/read-blog/25727_why-every-cricket-fan-ought-to-try-the-all-cricket-id-gaming-platform.html) for money or other prizes.
+
And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of worth.
+
The Philadelphia 76[ers' Paul](https://cristianoronaldoclub.com/read-blog/10044_for-sports-gambling-to-be-legalised.html) George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event
+
Social sweeps [gambling](https://2flab.com/read-blog/675_sports-minister-tracey-crouch-resigns-over-039-hold-up-039-to-betting-crackdown.html) establishment Stake ran an ad flaunting [Drake's](https://almightyblondeone.com/index.php/User:CooperApple) cars, planes and estates
+
Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker
+
Traditional online casinos are banned in all however 7 states, which has actually assisted to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.
+
Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't need normally require recognition. However, websites like Chumba will request IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.
+
Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit customers to submit mail-in demands for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the gamers follow painfully particular directions. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins merely for [signing](http://it-viking.ch/index.php/User:BradReinhardt79) up, therefore providing a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - genuine money.
+
So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to run in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?
+
According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a way of promoting their bread and butter.
+
'Social sweepstakes games are just a form of online entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is [required](https://bytes-the-dust.com/index.php/User:MarcGersten) to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never need to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an important difference between social sweeps and conventional online gaming websites like casinos.'
+
Consider the manner in which McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that [provide](http://hanbitoffice.com/whole/3943398) them the chance to win profitable prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.
+
And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the game itself does not satisfy the definition of gaming in the US.
+
'Sweepstakes are a long-standing technique for promoting all kinds of daily businesses in the United States, everything from hamburgers to publication memberships to coffee and home improvement stores,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are routinely used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'
+
But to many gambling industry experts, that [argument](https://wolvesbaneuo.com/wiki/index.php/User:AmosMuskett4860) does not cut it.
+
For starters, video gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thereby suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
+
'They don't last forever and they're generally not connected to casino-style video games of opportunity,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money free gifts.
+
'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the attributes commonly related to McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos provide" casino-like" payments, normally 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the common payout percentage for a momentary marketing sweepstakes is a trivial share of the income earned by the business [typically less than one percent]'
+
Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, providing consumers the opportunity to play casino-style games for genuine prizes. Much of those brick-and-mortar facilities have since been shuttered over allegations of unlawful gambling.
+
DJ Khaled is among a number of celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name
+
Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments must face similar analysis.
+
'These differences are not arbitrary,' [Wallach stated](http://wiki.faramirfiction.com/index.php?title=User:Fidel13466595303) of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have consistently been mentioned by courts and state chief law officer as key consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promotion remained in reality a guise for illegal [sports betting](https://famenest.com/read-blog/56136_just-how-much-are-americans-investing-in-sports-betting.html).'
+
One of the casino market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the issue.
+
'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are passing up considerable tax and profits chances as this [sports betting](http://www.yasunli.co.id/Yasunli/wikipedia/index.php/Pengguna:BlythePowers26) changes that carried out through regulated channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.
+
And then there are the complainants who have sued social casinos in more than a lots states.
+
Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the [Washington Post](http://www.seferpanim.com/read-blog/353_warner-bros-discovery-sets-stage-for-potential-cable-deal-by.html). Meanwhile VGW concurred to pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.
+
Michael Phelps has actually signed an offer with the VGW Group, which [owns Global](http://woorichat.com/read-blog/10302_exploring-the-sports-betting-industry-putting-ideas-into-practice.html) Poker
+
In the most recent suit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New york city state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is [explained](https://oeclub.org/index.php/User:TwilaKushner) in the filing as an 'unlawful [sports betting](https://younivix.com/read-blog/29840_how-to-play-bet9ja-online.html) [business](https://embargo.energy/index.php/User:CliftonRoque834). '
+
Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as accuseds in suits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's request for comment.
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) +
'We normally do not comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com through email. 'However, we note that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been officially served.
+
'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we operate, and remain confident about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play games across the majority of North America, as we have for more than a years, creating not only fantastic video games, user experiences and entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of requirements.
+
'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively common throughout the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to strongly safeguard any claim which may be brought versus us.'
+
The concerns in between conventional online gaming and sweepstakes casinos might show bothersome for some celebrity endorsers.
+
Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.
+
'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking illegal [sports betting](https://bytes-the-dust.com/index.php/User:MableZink42641) wagering 'sweeps' sites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong position against unlawful gaming - specifically when attempting to tamp down the periodic gambling scandal,' Glaser told [DailyMail](https://wooshbit.com/read-blog/18726_score-big-wins-how-sports-betting-software-drives-growth-and-engagement.html).com.
+
It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over allegations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.
+
Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting allegedly illegal [sports betting](http://www.vokipedia.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:GeorgiaAnglin6) websites
+
Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.
+
'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.
+
Neither an NBA spokesman nor the gamers' representatives responded to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also overlooked to react to DailyMail.com emails.
+
Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a responsibility to explain to consumers the differences and similarities between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.
+
'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our business practices more broadly,' the representative stated. 'Some of our values are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of everything we do.'
+
Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.
[bit.ly](https://bit.ly/Bet9jaPromotionCodeYOHAIG) +
'Celebrities who lend their names to shady illegal gaming websites are, at a minimum, their track [records](https://tartar.app/read-blog/1675_just-how-much-are-americans-investing-in-sports-betting.html) at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who declare damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state lawyers basic rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in prohibited gaming.'
+
New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton
\ No newline at end of file